한빛사논문
고려대학교 의과대학, 을지대학교 의과대학
Park, Shin-Hoo MDa,b,c; Lee, Chang-Min PhDa,d; Hur, Hoon PhDe; Min, Jae-Seok PhDa,b,f; Ryu, Seung Wan PhDg; Son, Young-Gil PhDg; Chae, Hyun Dong PhDh; Jeong, Oh PhDi; Jung, Mi Ran PhDi; Choi, Chang In PhDj; Song, Kyo Young PhDk; Lee, Han Hong PhDk; Kim, Ho Goon PhDl; Jee, Ye Seob PhDm; Hwang, Sun-Hwi PhDn; Lee, Moon-Soo PhDo; Kim, Kwang Hee PhDp; Seo, Sang Hyuk MDp; Jeong, In Ho PhDq; Son, Myoung Won PhDr; Kim, Chang Hyun PhDs; Yoo, Moon-Won MDt; Oh, Sung Jin PhDu; Kim, Jeong Goo PhDv; Hwang, Seong Ho MDv; Choi, Sung IL PhDw; Yang, Kyung Sook PhDx; Huang, Hua PhDy,z; Park, Sungsoo PhDa,b
aDepartment of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
bDivision of Foregut Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
cDepartment of Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Centre, Eulji University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
dDepartment of Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Republic of Korea
eDepartment of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
fDepartment of Surgery, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Cancer Centre, Busan, Republic of Korea
gDepartment of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, Republic of Korea
hDepartment of Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
iDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea
jDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan, Republic of Korea
kDepartment of Surgery, Seoul St Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
lDepartment of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
mDepartment of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
nPusan National University School of Medicine, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea
oDepartment of Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
pDepartment of Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Republic of Korea
qDepartment of Surgery, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
rDepartment of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Cheonan, Korea
sDepartment of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
tDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
uDepartment of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
vDepartment of Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
wDepartment of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea
xDepartment of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
yDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre, Shanghai, China
zDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Drs Shin-Hoo Park and Chang-Min Lee: have contributed equally to this work and should be considered first coauthors.
*Corresponding author: Sungsoo Park PhD
Abstract
Backgrounds: Strong evidence is lacking as no confirmatory randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). We performed an RCT to confirm if TLDG is different from LADG.
Methods: The XXXXX trial is a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase III, RCT of 442 patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. Patients were enrolled from 21 cancer care centers in South Korea between January 2018 and September 2020 and randomized to undergo TLDG or LADG using blocked randomization with a 1:1 allocation ratio, stratified by the participating investigators. Patients were treated through R0 resections by TLDG or LADG as the full analysis set of the XXXXX trial. The primary endpoint was morbidity within postoperative day 30, and the secondary endpoint was QoL for 1 year. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT XXXXXXXX).
Results: 442 patients were randomized (222 to TLDG, 220 to LADG), and 422 patients were included in the pure analysis (213 and 209, respectively). The overall complication rate did not differ between the two groups (TLDG vs. LADG: 12.2% vs. 17.2%). However, TLDG provided less postoperative ileus and pulmonary complications than LADG (0.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.006; and 0.5% vs. 4.3%, P=0.035, respectively). The QoL was better after TLDG than after LADG regarding emotional functioning at 6 months, pain at 3 months, anxiety at 3 and 6 months, and body image at 3 and 6 months (all P<0.05). However, these QoL differences were resolved at 1 year.
Conclusions: The XXXXX trial confirmed that TLDG is not different from LADG in terms of postoperative complication but has advantages to reduce ileus and pulmonary complications. TLDG can be a good option to offer better QoL in terms of pain, body image, emotion, and anxiety at 3-6 months.
논문정보
관련 링크
연구자 키워드
연구자 ID
관련분야 연구자보기
소속기관 논문보기
관련분야 논문보기
해당논문 저자보기