한빛사논문
Jiye Kwon 1, William Pelletiers 1, Jessica Galloway Peña 2, David van Duin 3, Leila Ledbetter 4, Keri Baum 5, Felicia Ruffin 6, Jane M Knisely 7, Erica Bizzell 8, Vance G Fowler Jr 5,6, Henry F Chambers 9, Melinda M Pettigrew 1; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group
1Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
2Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
3Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
4Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
5Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
6Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
7National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
8Office of Scientific Program and Policy Analysis, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
9Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jiye Kwon and William Pelletiers contributed equally to this article.
Alternate corresponding author: Keri Baum, B.S.
Corresponding author: Melinda M. Pettigrew, Ph.D.
Abstract
Background: Equitable representation of members from historically marginalized groups is important in clinical trials, which inform standards of care. The goal of this study was to characterize the demographics and proportional subgroup reporting and representation of participants enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of antibacterials used to treat Staphylococcus aureus infections.
Methods: We examined randomized controlled registrational and strategy trials published from 2000-2021 to determine the sex, race, and ethnicity of participants. Participation to incidence ratios (PIRs) were calculated by dividing the percentage of study participants in each demographic group by the percentage of the disease population in each group. Underrepresentation was defined as a PIR <0.8.
Results: Of the 87 included studies, 82 (94.2%) reported participant sex; 69 (79.3%) reported participant race; and 20 (23.0%) included ethnicity data. Only 17 (19.5%) studies enrolled American Indian/Alaskan Native participants. Median PIRs indicated that Asian and Black participants were underrepresented in RCTs compared with the incidence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections in these subgroups. Underrepresentation of Black participants was associated with a larger study size, international sites, industry sponsorship, and Phase 2/3 trials compared with Phase 4 trials (P<0.05 for each). Black participants had over 4 times the odds of being underrepresented in Phase 2/3 trials compared with Phase 4 trials (OR 4.57; 95% CI 1.14-18.3).
Conclusions: Standardized reporting methods for race and ethnicity and efforts to increase recruitment of marginalized groups would help ensure equity, rigor, and generalizability in RCTs of antibacterial agents and reduce health inequities.
논문정보
관련 링크
연구자 ID
관련분야 연구자보기
소속기관 논문보기
관련분야 논문보기
해당논문 저자보기