한빛사논문
Jieun Kang a, Hwan-Cheol Kim b, Youngwon Jang c, Jung Bok Lee d, Jae Seung Lee c, Yeon-Mok Oh c, Hyun Woo Ji e, Ji Ye Jung f,1, Sei Won Lee c,1
aDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea
bDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea
cDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
dDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
eDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea
fDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
1These authors contributed equally as corresponding authors.
Corresponding authors : Ji Ye Jung, Sei Won Lee
Abstract
Background: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a well-known risk factor for worse outcomes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, evidence-based guidance on effective personal behavioural strategies to minimise the effects of PM2.5 is limited. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a behavioural intervention in reducing PM2.5 exposure and improving clinical outcomes in patients with COPD.
Materials and methods: Participants were 1:1 randomised, and the intervention group received a behavioural intervention consisting of five activities, while the control group received usual care. The participants were followed up for 9 months. The primary outcomes were differences in the score of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for patients with COPD (SGRQ-C) and COPD assessment test (CAT) from baseline.
Results: A total of 106 participants were enrolled and 102 completed the study. At the end of the study, the intervention group showed significant improvements in the primary outcomes compared to the control group, with a group difference of -5.9 in the reduction of total SGRQ-C (-3.4 vs. 2.5; p = 0.049) and -3.8 in the CAT score (-1.2 vs. 2.7; p = 0.001). Participants with good adherence to the intervention demonstrated a greater extent of improvement in CAT score and lower PM2.5 levels compared to those who had poor adherence or were in the control group. Regular checking of air quality forecasts was significantly associated with a reduction in CAT scores among all the intervention activities.
Conclusion: Individual-level behavioural interventions can be an effective strategy for mitigating the health hazards associated with PM2.5.
논문정보
관련 링크
연구자 키워드
관련분야 연구자보기
관련분야 논문보기