안윤주 (건국대학교)

한빛사 논문

조회151

건국대학교

CV File 77 kb

J. Hazard. Mater., Sep 12 2023, 461 S0304-3894(23)01818-6 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132535 TRIAD method to assess ecological risks of contaminated soils in abandoned mine sites.

Dokyung Kim ^a, Jin Il Kwak ^a, Tae-Yang Lee ^a, Lia Kim ^a, Haemi Kim ^a, Sun Hwa Nam ^a, Wonjae Hwang b, June Wee ^b, Yong Ho Lee ^c, Songhee Kim ^d, Ji-In Kim ^e, Sunhee Hong^f, Seunghun Hyun ^g, Seung-Woo Jeong ^d, Youn-Joo An ^a

^aDepartment of Environmental Health Science, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea

^bOjeong Resilience Institute, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea

^cHumanities and Ecology Consensus Resilience Laboratory, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea

^dDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan 54150, Republic of Korea

^eSoil and Groundwater Research Division, National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon 22689, Republic of Korea

^fDepartment of Plant Resources and Landscape, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea

^gDepartment of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-Ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea

Corresponding author : Youn-Joo An

Abstract

Site-specific soil ecological risk assessment is important for protecting soil ecosystems because it reflects the environmental factors at the site to detect ecological risks and develop risk management measures. This study assessed the ecological risks from chemical pollutants in abandoned mine sites using the TRIAD approach, evaluating its overall applicability, including the tiered system of assessment. A site-specific soil ecological risk assessment was conducted for five abandoned mine sites (Sites 1-4 and R, the reference site); integrated risks (IRs) for each site were calculated. Our results of the Tier 2 assessment showed that IRs at Sites 1-4 were 0.701, 0.758, 0.840, and 0.429, respectively. The IR classification was moderate, high, high, and low risk, in that order for Sites 1-4, the same as that for Tier 1. The IR had more varied analyses, emphasizing the significance of conducting higher tiered analyses under TRIAD while maintaining a balance between soil ecosystem protection and socioeconomic costs. Multiple analyses reduced the uncertainty of IR, thus enabling efficient risk management decision-making to protect soil ecosystems. Our study provides a basis for using the TRIAD for soil assessment and establishing policies for site-specific soil ecological risk assessments.

논문정보

형식Research article
게재일2023년 09월 (BRIC 등록일 2023-09-25)
연구진국내 연구진
분야 생명과학 > 농림생태환경

댓글 작성 로그인

CV 열람하기

연락처 보기