한빛사논문
Jaeik Oh1,2,9, Chanwoong Hwa3,4,5,9, Dongjun Jang6, Seungjae Shin6, Soo-Jin Lee6, Jiwon Kim6, Sang Eun Lee6, Hae Rim Jung7, Yumi Oh7, Giyong Jang7, Obin Kwon6,7, Joon-Yong An3,4,* and Sung-Yup Cho1,6,7,8,*
1Department of Translational Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea. 2Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. 3School of Biosystem and Biomedical Science, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea. 4BK21FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea. 5Department of Integrated Biomedical and Life Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea. 6Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea. 7Medical Research Center, Genomic Medicine Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea. 8Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Korea. 9These authors contributed equally: Jaeik Oh, Chanwoong Hwa.
*Corresponding author.
Abstract
N6-Methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification plays a critical role in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. Alterations in cellular m6A levels and m6A-related genes have been reported in many cancers, but whether they play oncogenic or tumor-suppressive roles is inconsistent across cancer types. We investigated common features of alterations in m6A modification and m6A-related genes during carcinogenesis by analyzing transcriptome data of 11 solid tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and our in-house gastric cancer cohort. We calculated m6A writer (W), eraser (E), and reader (R) signatures based on corresponding gene expression. Alterations in the W and E signatures varied according to the cancer type, with a strong positive correlation between the W and E signatures in all types. When the patients were divided according to m6A levels estimated by the ratio of the W and E signatures, the prognostic effect of m6A was inconsistent according to the cancer type. The R and especially the R2 signatures (based on the expression of IGF2BPs) were upregulated in all cancers. Patients with a high R2 signature exhibited poor prognosis across types, which was attributed to enrichment of cell cycle- and epithelial–mesenchymal transition-related pathways. Our study demonstrates common features of m6A alterations across cancer types and suggests that targeting m6A R proteins is a promising strategy for cancer treatment.
논문정보
관련 링크
연구자 ID
관련분야 연구자보기
관련분야 논문보기